CurrentBeastBriefsPreviousOUTnovationsRecommended
Microfits - Jabs at the Redmond Beast
MicroFits Guilty of Violating Antitrust Act

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has ruled MicroFits, the Jab giant, guilty of violating the Sherman and Peabody Antitrust Act. Jackson found that the Web site used its position to "monopolize the Redmond humor market" to the detriment of destitute Microsoft executives and the family members whose mouths they are struggling to feed.

"I am only trying to do what visitors demand," responded SJS Web Hack, MicroFits Chairman and Chief Jabware Architect. "Do you have any idea how many sleepless nights I've had trying to come up with funny stories? Do you? Okay, maybe one or two -- but jeeze was I cranky the next morning."

Jackson wrote that MicroFits violated Section 2 of the Sherman and Peabody Act by its constant referrals to outdated Microsoft products, also known as an abuse of the Wayback clause. He also wrote that the site violated Section 1 by unlawfully tying its humor to a single operating system.

"The facts found do not support the conclusion, however, that the effect of MicroFits' marketing arrangements with Victoria's Secret constituted unlawful exclusive dealing," Jackson wrote.

The case will now proceed to its final phase, during which Jackson will likely hear more arguments from each side and then decide what remedies to impose on MicroFits. He could do anything from breaking up the Web site into "baby beasts", to imposing restrictions on how vulgar any one page may be.


Vote this a Fave?  |  Feedback in the Forum


This site is hosted by The Microsoft Boycott Campaign. These pages have been archived here to preserve anti-Microsoft content and will not be updated. Originally created by "SJS Web Hack." ©2001 The Microsoft Boycott Campaign, under the Open Content License. User Agreement, Copyright, & Privacy Policy.